Western democracies have faced an increasing challenge from a particularly elusive and dangerous form of terrorism: the lone wolf attacker. Unlike traditional terrorist networks, these individuals operate independently, often radicalising rapidly and acting with little to no external support. The Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) has analysed this evolving threat, uncovering critical trends in lone wolf terrorism, its growing connection to youth radicalisation, and the broader implications for security and policy.
The data is striking. Ninety-three per cent of fatal terrorist attacks in the West over the last five years have been carried out by lone wolf actors. In 2024 alone, terrorist incidents in the West surged to fifty-two, a sharp increase from thirty-two the previous year. As a result, seven Western countries, Germany, the US, France, the UK, Australia, Canada, and Sweden, now rank among the top 50 nations on the Global Terrorism Index 2025.
This rise in lone actor terrorism represents a shift from large-scale, organised attacks to decentralised violence. While some attackers claim allegiance to known extremist groups, many operate independently, radicalised through online communities and ideological propaganda. The ease of access to extremist content, coupled with minimal barriers to entry, has made these attacks increasingly difficult to predict and prevent.
During 2024, the total number of terrorist incidents in the West rose to over 50, up from 32 in the previous year. Lone wolf actors carried out 93% on fatal terrorist attacks in the West over the last five years.
One of the most concerning aspects of modern lone wolf terrorism is the speed at which radicalisation occurs. In 2002, it took an average of sixteen months for an individual to move from exposure to extremist material to executing an attack. By 2015, this period had shrunk by over forty per cent. Today, in some cases, radicalisation happens in mere weeks.
The acceleration of this process is largely due to digital platforms, where extremist networks exploit algorithms to expose vulnerable individuals to radical content. Social media and encrypted messaging apps serve as incubators for extremist ideologies, enabling self-radicalisation without the need for direct in-person recruitment. This development has made it increasingly challenging for law enforcement to identify and intervene before attacks occur.
Three key factors influence radicalisation – ideological flexibility, youth targeting by extremist groups and the impact of ongoing geopolitical unrest.
Youth radicalisation has emerged as a troubling phenomenon, with minors playing an increasing role in terrorist activities. In 2024, nearly two-thirds of ISIS-linked arrests in Europe involved teenagers. In the UK, one in five terror suspects is now under eighteen, and similar patterns have been observed in Australia, Austria, and France.
Young people, often disillusioned or seeking a sense of purpose, are particularly susceptible to extremist propaganda. Online extremist groups specifically target them, offering a sense of identity and belonging. In some cases, adolescents are drawn into violence through a mix of ideological indoctrination and personal grievances, with external actors providing guidance remotely.
The rise of lone wolf terrorism has coincided with an increase in mass casualty attacks, particularly in the US. While not all mass shootings are classified as terrorism, they share many of the same characteristics, including ideological motivations, online radicalisation, and the targeting of civilians. Between 2000 and 2009, the US averaged 3.7 mass shooting events per year, rising to 5.8 per year in the 2010s, and 5.6 per year from 2020 to 2024.
The distinction between terrorism and mass shootings is increasingly blurred, particularly as lone actors adopt hybrid ideologies that blend political, religious, and conspiratorial narratives. The lack of clear ideological affiliations often complicates law enforcement responses, making it difficult to classify and combat these attacks effectively.
Lone wolf attacks present distinct security challenges. Unlike group-based terrorist plots, these attacks leave little intelligence footprint. Operating in isolation, lone actors do not rely on extensive financial support, making their activities harder to track. In Europe, between 1994 and 2021, over sixty-one per cent of lone wolf jihadist plots were successfully launched, compared to just eighteen per cent of group plots.
Additionally, the psychological impact of lone wolf attacks is profound. The randomness and unpredictability of these attacks create a pervasive sense of fear, as citizens feel that anyone, anywhere, could be a target. The involvement of minors in these attacks further complicates security efforts, as law enforcement must differentiate between adolescent rebellion and genuine extremist intent.
Seven countries in the West are now ranked in the worst 50 on the Global Terrorism Index: Germany (27th), the US (34th), France (40th), the UK (41st), Australia (46th), Canada (48th) and Sweden (50th).
IEP’s analysis of lone wolf terrorism highlights the importance of understanding the root causes of radicalisation. The ‘bathtub model’ conceptualises radicalisation as a process where different motivations – ideological, psychological, and personal – fill a metaphorical bathtub. When the water level overflows, an attack occurs.
Key triggers accelerate this process:
To combat the growing threat of lone wolf terrorism, Western democracies must adopt a multi-faceted approach:
Lone wolf terrorism represents a dynamic and evolving threat. As extremist networks continue to adapt, so too must counterterrorism strategies. The rapid pace of radicalisation, the increasing involvement of minors, and the blurred lines between terrorism and other forms of violence necessitate a fresh approach to security and prevention.
By understanding the factors driving lone wolf attacks and implementing proactive countermeasures, Western democracies can work towards mitigating this growing threat while upholding fundamental civil liberties and social cohesion. The challenge is complex, but a data-driven, multi-pronged approach offers the best path forward in addressing this critical security issue.
— Download the Global Terrorism Index 2025 Press Release
— Request a Media Interview.
— View the Global Terrorism Index 2025 interactive map
— Understanding Global Terrorism Index 2025 – Frequently Asked Questions